RANTS  &  RAVES  2018



    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Ironic "Quote Of The Day" from the employer of the food service vendor caught smuggling in toxic drugs thought to
    have sickened a dozen Allegheny County Jail officers during searches for contraband

    "Our efficient programs, procedures and protocols allow us to provide menus that positively impact inmate behavior, which allows your staff to
    remain focused on managing facility security."
    Summit Food Services, from its website page titled "Food That Drives Positive Behavior," boasting that the company "has the experience
    and resources to provide high quality and value-driven food service programs to meet the daily demands within correctional facilities"


    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    This 66-degree gift of a day

    RAVES for this glorious, sunny 66-degree gift of a day in between the last and next round of ice, snow, frigid temperatures and frozen pipes.

    Savour the day and any more that we're fortunate enough to get before the winter gear gets pulled back on and Spring really does arrive two
    months down the road. (11 Jan 18)  
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



    Audacious Al: still embarrassing Fay
    Some Connellsville hotel investors suing fellow investors

    RAVES with applause to the Daily Courier, for digging up an authentic, real news story, on some investors in Connellsville's Cobblestone Hotel
    accusing fellow investors of breach of contract, embezzlement and fraud, in a mouth-dropping, 17-count civil action suit.

    As per the Courier's "Cobblestone embroiled in controversy: F.C. judge orders principals to report hotel finances to limited partners," some hotel
    investors are at legal odds with another handful of other investors, including former county commissioner Al Ambrosini and his former campaign
    staff/courthouse assistant/former Connellsville Redevelopment Authority member Geno Gallo.

    The duo first was sued in Allegheny County courts three months ago, by the same fellow investors, in an action that was later dropped. The
    matter now, however, is in Fayette County courts. The investors suing fellow investors Ambrosini, Gallo and others seek $35,000 for most of the
    17 different counts, as per the Courier.    



    As per online information about the $5 million hotel, funding for its construction came from private sources and a significant amount of public funds
    as well.

    That said, RANTS that anyone would dare to disregard his or her signed group agreement to include each investor in key business decisions  --
    you know, such as borrowing $200,000, reportedly, to meet basic hotel operational costs.

    This time, after all, it wasn't Zimmerlink kept out of the loop in the next office who didn't get the papers. It was a handful of serious investors who
    deserve to have their investments returned -- i.e., if there was or still is a profit to be returned.  

     

    RANTS, at a time when Connellsville desperately needs all the jobs it can possibly get, that these ridiculous shenanigans are real but such surreal
    news. Again, we stress appreciation to The Courier for the story. That's not the problem. It should be in the news.

    It's just that the court's time should not have to be wasted insisting that Ambrosini's handful group of principal investors update limited investment
    partners with a monthly fiscal report. This really is ridiculous.

    Any Fay judge who hasn't had time yet in almost one year to hear the county's motions to overturn two of Rants&Raves' Office of Open Records
    appeal wins should be much, much too busy to waste time providing basic 101 business tutorials to Ambrosini and the other defendants. A judge
    should have to order that written advance consent be obtained for future loans or major expenses not previously agreed upon by the rest of the
    investors? Really?

    Does a quacking duck really not echo? (5 Jan 18)
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



    "Quotes Of The Day"

    "I don't feel sorry for those investors. They should have known not to go into business with someone who lied in a recorded public meeting that he
    created over 120 jobs with the power company on Route 201 paying $60,000-$120,000 salaries. I spent an hour driving 201 looking for the place."
    Pete, to all of us, this morning at the diner, as he read The Daily Courier's story referenced above, referencing past dialogue at a county commissioner
    meeting when citizens questioned the validity of the impressive but proven to be untrue whopper

    "I don't believe you! You're making this up!"
    Moi, violating the Think Tank's cardinal rule not to grab away a paper or read over someone's shoulder, needing to get a look at actual print, because Pete
    can jag anyone around convincingly for a while, before he starts to smile and give himself away;
    Moi, shaking my head in disbelief of what was in print before us

    "No (expletive) way!"
    Pete's wife, coming in for a closer read, too, since she, too, thought Pete was joshing


    Meanwhile, 15 minutes later...

    "Look, the paper sold out. Think the people at the paper realize that copies sell off the stands when there's real news on the front page?"
    Pete's observant grandson in his second year of college commenting on the empty newspaper shelf







    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    RAVES for a beautiful white Christmas after all.  (25 Dec 17)
    369 days... since
    Rants&Raves requested A
    Right To Know to obtain
    records of county
    contracting rates and the
    spending of public funds
    279 days... with no court date set yet, since the County filed in Court of
    Common Pleas to set aside this column's last 2 of 3 successful state Office of Open
    Records appeals to obtain information that the County denied under the Right To
    Know Law.

    Could it be that no county judge wants to set aside a state OOR decision? Could it be
    no judge wants to have to ask why the County gave sworn affidavits to the OOR that
    the information didn't exist, although previously obtained RTK answers proved that
    the County did have the information? Could it be no judge wants to open that can of
    Perjury Worms?

    Could it be that the County parked the matter in "legal" limbo by filing to set aside
    the OOR rulings until this column likewise files to dismiss the County's cowardly
    filed petition?  

    Could it be all of the above? jt